OneWorld.net (U.S.)

OneWorld.net note: On Sunday, Burma's foreign minister hinted that the ruling junta may release democracy advocate and political prisoner Aung San Suu Kyi in six months, but critics fear the statement is little more than an attempt to manipulate international opinion.

Aung San Suu Kyi has spent over twelve of the last twenty years under house arrest. © Dejan Georgievski

• This Monday, Burma signed the new charter for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). The charter includes commitments to democratic principles and human rights, prompting some observers to suggest that Burma's ratification of the document will have a positive effect on human rights in the country. Others remain critical of the military regime's intentions.
• Two days following the Burmese foreign minister's statement regarding Suu Kyi's release, the International Herald Tribune reported that the Burmese official had been "misunderstood" and that Suu Kyi may remain in detention until late 2009.
• Aung San Suu Kyi, a Nobel Peace Prize laureate, is the daughter of Burma's independence hero Aung San. In 1990, Suu Kyi's political party, the National League for Democracy, won 82 percent of Burma's parliamentary seats in a democratic election. The ruling military junta refused to recognize the results. Suu Kyi is now in her 13th year of house arrest.
• Aung San Suu Kyi turned 63 this year. On her Jun. 19 birthday, supporters of Suu Kyi were arrested while demonstrating for her release. On Jul. 17, fourteen of these supporters were charged with unlawful assembly and causing a "public offense." Under Burmese law, the charge of public offense is punishable with a fine and up to two years in prison.

SOUTH-EAST ASIA: Offer to Release Suu Kyi a Ploy?

From: Inter Press Service

BANGKOK, Jul 22 (IPS) - Reacting to growing international pressure Burma’s military regime has said it will consider releasing the pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi from house arrest in six months.

That verbal assurance by Burmese foreign minister Nyan Win was made Sunday, at the opening of the foreign ministers’ meeting of the Association of South-east Asian Nations (ASEAN). It was confirmed by Singapore foreign minister George Yeo, host of the 10-member bloc’s 41st ministerial meeting being held in the city-state this week.

But such a gesture of conciliation -- the first by a Burmese minister, where a specific timetable for Suu Kyi’s freedom has been spelled out -- has been received with more scepticism than praise. For the military rulers in Burma, or Myanmar, have a notorious record of sounding soft and appearing to compromise when they are under political heat from regional governments and beyond.

Even Nyan Win’s attempt to give the amnesty announcement a veneer of legal authenticity is being dismissed by former political prisoners in Burma. He is reported to have said that Suu Kyi’s current period under house arrest will reach its six-year limit by the next six months.

‘’These statements are not based on sincerity. The military regime wants to reduce the international pressure so it is using the release of Daw Suu Kyi as a ploy,’’ says Bo Kyi, a former Burmese political prisoner and a leading member of the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners in Burma (AAPP), a group that monitors and supports political prisoners. ‘’They have made similar promises before.’’

The legal limit to hold a political prisoner is five years, he added during a telephone interview from Mae Sot, along the Thai-Burma border. ‘’If they are serious, they should release her now. Why wait? The minister’s announcement is not based on the law.’’

Suu Kyi, who leads the opposition National League for Democracy (NLD) party, has spent more than 12 of the past 18 years under house arrest in her dilapidated family home in Rangoon. The Nobel Peace laureate began her current stretch in detention in May 2003.

ASEAN ministers were clearly in no mood to let this status quo prevail. A strong statement released by the group noted its ‘’deep disappointment’’ in the junta’s decision to extend Suu Kyi’s detention for a sixth year in late May, and said that the junta should demonstrate real measures to move the country ‘’toward a peaceful transition to democracy in the near future’’.

ASEAN’s members include Brunei, Burma, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. The group was formed in 1967 to stall the spread of communism and promote free-market policies. Last November, its leaders signed a rules-based charter aimed at strengthening unity and upholding human rights.

The pressure generated by ASEAN on Burma has confirmed its willingness, when faced by a serious threat to its credibility, to depart from its long-held principle of not interfering with the internal affairs of a fellow member. Signs of this shift have been evident since Suu Kyi’s current spell under house arrest, with the harshest rebuke before this week coming last year. It followed the junta’s use of force to crackdown on thousands of monks, protesting peacefully on the streets for greater political freedom last September.

ASEAN’s current statement, however, is grounded in another area where the oppressive Burmese regime has been found wanting: aiding the victims of the powerful Cyclone Nargis, which tore through Burma’s Irrawaddy Delta in early May. The disaster killed between 130,000 to 300,000 people and affected another 2.5 million to four million people.

ASEAN stepped in to aid its beleaguered member as part of a relief, rehabilitation and reconstruction effort that also involved the United Nations. But progress has been slow, with the junta reluctant to remove all the roadblocks to help the victims. Singapore’s Yeo recently gave the ASEAN effort in post-cyclone Burma a ‘’C’’ grade, according to local media reports.

And it cannot risk a further decline since ASEAN tried to convince the international community that its involvement in the recovery effort would ensure better results. For the Burmese regime, though, it meant an easier way of attracting the millions of dollars in aid.

But international donors are still not moved. ‘’The international community is still suspicious of the military regime. They are not sure if the regime will be sincere in the rehabilitation phase,’’ says Soe Aung, spokesman for the National Council of the Union of Burma, a network of Burmese political groups living in exile.

‘’ASEAN’s statement reflects this. It is a way of using the situation to apply some pressure,’’ he explained in an interview. ‘’The military regime’s offer of freedom for Suu Kyi is also due to this lack of funds. The regime is hoping to gain some sympathy and money.’’

ASEAN is worried that the international donors will not come to the table to help in the next phase of the post-cyclone effort, says Debbie Stothard of ALTSEAN, a regional human rights lobby. An ASEAN and U.N. report revealed Monday that Burma will need one billion US dollars to rebuild the devastated parts of the country over the next three years.

‘’ASEAN’s leaders are slowly understanding that they cannot be made fools by the Burmese regime,’’ Stothard told IPS. ‘’Cyclone Nargis has provided an opening for the regional leaders and the international community to engage with the regime differently than before.’’

To read more about Burma from the Inter Press Service, click here.